visual experience of prehistoric human

نویسندگان

سمانه رستم بیگی

دانشجوی دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه هنر سعید زاویه

استادیار دانشگاه هنر، تهران

چکیده

this research wants to consider the formation process of outline and spotted shapes in prehistoric periods. the light and the various form of its reflection, which appears as a shadow, silhouette and lightfast, and the way of facing human with nature surrounding him, is the theoretical base of this paper. light is one of the important elements in nature which help human to know and comprehend its surroundings. so studying the affects of light in human life and discovering all its power, could help us to know more about prehistoric humans who were our ancestors and the images which they created. these images are the most important documents which could help us to understand the prehistoric periods and the men created these images, whom are the builders of our historical life. besides all, considering prehistoric time could help us at first, to know more about our origins, physical characteristics and abilities as a human, and in secondly as a creature of images and painters. consideration of prehistoric motifs shows that these forms contain symbolic and mysterious concepts besides simplicity. along with, most evidences shows that images are originated from nature and precisely from conceptions of prehistoric men from nature. one thing that we can see in consideration of prehistoric motifs is the black and even forms which are abstractive and deformed, and we interpret them as the “silhouettes” which are made from moving light source. this essay with scientific approach and by using empiricists, behaviorist's outlooks and linguistic models is tried to analyze its hypothesis which is the black images remains on the prehistoric rocks. for accomplishing this, our research used descriptive and analytic methods with observational and bibliotheca techniques besides experimental tests to discover the similarity between humans all around the world in making images because of the similarity in comprehension of surroundings. and it wants to prove that the way of prehistoric men illustration was articulate for them and they could communicate and dialogue with each other by their images which were their visual longue. consequently we could claim that because of the limited knowledge of prehistoric men about their nature in comparison with present human being who have large amount of information and knowledge about his surroundings due to the improvement of technology and communications systems, that way of illustrating was responder to their need of visual dialogue. because of the improving communication networks which have increased the speed of exchanging information, the artists started to represent something more creative and different from just their conception from nature. so because of all various conceptions, representations and productions, it seems that contemporary man is smarter than prehistoric one. but the fact is just the improvement of technology and knowledge about surrounding make today human different from prehistoric man and in depth both are sapiens who have ability to talk, make tools and communicate with its genre. it means that what we can see in prehistoric paintings is representative of the way that prehistoric men deal with their surroundings.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An fMRI study of human visual cortex in response to spatiotemporal properties of visual stimuli

  ABSTRACT  Background: The brain response to temporal frequencies (TF) has been already reported, but with no study reported for different TF with respect to various spatial frequencies (SF).  Materials and Methods: fMRI was performed by 1.5T GE-system in 14 volunteers during checkerboard, with TFs of 4, 6, 8 and 10Hz in low and high SFs of 0.5 and 8cpd.  Results: Average percentage BOLD signa...

متن کامل

Parasites as probes for prehistoric human migrations?

Host-specific parasites of humans are used to track ancient migrations. Based on archaeoparasitology, it is clear that humans entered the New World at least twice in ancient times. The archaeoparasitology of some intestinal parasites in the New World points to migration routes other than the Bering Land Bridge. Helminths have been found in mummies and coprolites in North and South America. Hook...

متن کامل

Prehistoric bird extinctions and human hunting.

Holocene fossils document the extinction of hundreds of bird species on Pacific islands during prehistoric human occupation. Human hunting is implicated in these extinctions, but the impact of hunting is difficult to disentangle from the effects of other changes induced by humans, including habitat destruction and the introduction of other mammalian predators. Here, we use data from bones colle...

متن کامل

Prehistoric human impacts on Rapa, French Polynesia

New excavations and survey on the island of Rapa have shown that a rockshelter was occupied by early settlers around AD 1200 and the first hill forts were erected about 300 years later. Refortification occurred up to the contact period and proliferated around AD 1700. Taro cultivation in terraced pond-fields kept pace with the construction of forts. The authors make a connection between fort-bu...

متن کامل

Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement.

Why are human observers particularly sensitive to human movement? Seven experiments examined the roles of visual experience and motor processes in human movement perception by comparing visual sensitivities to point-light displays of familiar, unusual, and impossible gaits across gait-speed and identity discrimination tasks. In both tasks, visual sensitivity to physically possible gaits was sup...

متن کامل

Mysteries of Visual Experience

Science is a crowning glory of the human spirit and its applications remain our best hope for social progress. But there are limitations to current science and perhaps to any science. The general mind-body problem is known to be intractable and currently mysterious. This is one of many deep problems that are universally agreed to be beyond the current purview of Science, including quantum pheno...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
هنرهای تجسمی

جلد ۴، شماره ۴۹، صفحات ۷۱-۸۲

کلمات کلیدی
this research wants to consider the formation process of outline and spotted shapes in prehistoric periods. the light and the various form of its reflection which appears as a shadow silhouette and lightfast and the way of facing human with nature surrounding him is the theoretical base of this paper. light is one of the important elements in nature which help human to know and comprehend its surroundings. so studying the affects of light in human life and discovering all its power could help us to know more about prehistoric humans who were our ancestors and the images which they created. these images are the most important documents which could help us to understand the prehistoric periods and the men created these images whom are the builders of our historical life. besides all considering prehistoric time could help us at first to know more about our origins physical characteristics and abilities as a human and in secondly as a creature of images and painters. consideration of prehistoric motifs shows that these forms contain symbolic and mysterious concepts besides simplicity. along with most evidences shows that images are originated from nature and precisely from conceptions of prehistoric men from nature. one thing that we can see in consideration of prehistoric motifs is the black and even forms which are abstractive and deformed and we interpret them as the “silhouettes” which are made from moving light source. this essay with scientific approach and by using empiricists behaviorist's outlooks and linguistic models is tried to analyze its hypothesis which is the black images remains on the prehistoric rocks. for accomplishing this our research used descriptive and analytic methods with observational and bibliotheca techniques besides experimental tests to discover the similarity between humans all around the world in making images because of the similarity in comprehension of surroundings. and it wants to prove that the way of prehistoric men illustration was articulate for them and they could communicate and dialogue with each other by their images which were their visual longue. consequently we could claim that because of the limited knowledge of prehistoric men about their nature in comparison with present human being who have large amount of information and knowledge about his surroundings due to the improvement of technology and communications systems that way of illustrating was responder to their need of visual dialogue. because of the improving communication networks which have increased the speed of exchanging information the artists started to represent something more creative and different from just their conception from nature. so because of all various conceptions representations and productions it seems that contemporary man is smarter than prehistoric one. but the fact is just the improvement of technology and knowledge about surrounding make today human different from prehistoric man and in depth both are sapiens who have ability to talk make tools and communicate with its genre. it means that what we can see in prehistoric paintings is representative of the way that prehistoric men deal with their surroundings.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023